There are myriad ethical considerations relating to the use of GenAI, from intellectual property and copyright to data privacy, from academic integrity to environmental sustainability.
Here are some best practices concerning academic integrity and the use of AI to support writing.
Pigg (2024) found that there are important differences between how experts and students use these tools.
This suggests that while GenAI can be a useful tool, it's most valuable when you already have some understanding of your topic. Being aware of your motivations for using GenAI can therefore help you to adjust your expectations and value your own intellectual contributions.
When it comes to writing with GenAI, there are particular concerns for international, multilingual, and marginalized students. AI writing tools often standardize language and erase culturally diverse knowledge, making it difficult for students to preserve their authentic voices and points of view (Owusu-Ansah 2023; Ghimire 2025). Ghimire developed the 4P Praxis to empower writers to engage with GenAI critically and preserve their own voice. While this praxis was developed with multilingual students in mind, it is a useful rubric for anyone who wants to retain agency over the AI writing process.
Ghimire, A. (2025). Utilizing ChatGPT to integrate world English and diverse knowledge: A transnational perspective in critical artificial intelligence (AI) literacy. Computers and Composition, 75, 102913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102913
Owusu-Ansah, A. L. (2023). Defining moments, definitive programs, and the continued erasure of missing people. Composition Studies, 51(1), 143-148.